About
Professional background
Steve has qualified as a barrister and solicitor in New Zealand and as a solicitor in England, now practicing as a civil barrister in Auckland. He is a founding member of FortyEight Shortland, commercial and civil barristers' chambers in Auckland.
Experience
- Strategic legal advice
- General civil and commercial litigation
- Insurance disputes including business interruption
- Legal opinions on civil rights and remedies
- Breach of contract claims (distribution, supply, commercial, property sale/purchase)
- Negligence claims involving professionals and local authorities
- Technology and AI matters
- Defamation
- Personal litigation (relationship property, will challenges)
- Contract termination advice and strategy
- Professional discipline representation
- Non-NZ law advice including judgment registration/enforcement
- Personal injury with extra-territorial dimensions and ACC considerations
- District Court, High Court, Court of Appeal, and tribunal advocacy
- Trust and trustee claims
- Shareholder, partnership, and joint venture disputes
- Commercial drafting and terms/conditions
- Professional discipline for lawyers, accountants, and other professionals
Insurance practice
As an experienced insurance barrister, Steve assists clients with insurance disputes, including claims resolution and advice on commercial and relationship issues arising from insurance product distribution. Clients include brokers, policyholders, and solicitors. He spent eight years in the London insurance market specialising in insurance claims, covering:
- Policy coverage issues — determining whether claims or events are covered
- Professional indemnity — claims against lawyers, accountants, valuers, architects, engineers
- Credit insurance — insurance of customer credit
- Brokers/intermediaries — relationships between policyholders, insurers, reinsurers
- Distribution — issues between insurers, distributors (banks), intermediaries
- Directors and Officers (D&O) insurance
- Life/disability insurance — disputes for both insurers and policyholders
- General (non-life) insurance — material damage policies for commercial and residential property
- Construction/CAR insurance — contractor's all risk coverage
- Subrogated claims
- Cyber insurance
- Business interruption — including Covid-19 pandemic and government lockdown claims
Relationship property
Steve has significant experience in civil disputes and provides advice and representation for relationship property matters. He focuses on equitable and trust claims, relationship property disputes involving business assets, and asset valuation issues. Claims are typically heard in the High Court. He offers independent legal advice on relationship property agreements.
“I have a particular interest in receiving instructions which involve forensic work, including tracing and valuing assets.”
General practice
Steve maintains a general civil practice covering relationship property, estate matters (including Family Protection Act claims), and property disputes such as caveat removal applications and Property Law Act relief.
Track record
Court decisions
- Counsel for appellant: Turner v Goldsbury [2024] NZCA 292
- Trial counsel for defendant: Mao v Golden Abacus [2024] NZHC 1048
- Interim injunction success: Na'amanu v Morisa [2023] NZHC 3599
- Successful High Court appeal respondent: Li v Chen [2018] NZHC 2843
- Discovery application respondent: Haven Insurance v Lombard [2018] NZHC 2421
- Caveat removal application: P v P [2018] NZHC 185
- High Court appeal respondent: Karmarkar v Manda [2018] NZHC 2081
- Summary judgment respondent: Green v Green [2018] NZDC 3780
- Declaratory relief trial counsel: Franklyn v Green [2019] NZHC 2632
- Non-party discovery respondent: Golden Grand Trading Limited v Green Traders Ltd [2019] NZHC 2193
- Civil appeal unsuccessful: Harvey v Tasman District Council [2019] NZHC 2025
- Administration Act show-cause (successful): Jones v Jones [2022] NZHC 2050
- Covenant removal: Latter v Bong [2022] NZHC 20
- Court of Appeal leave application (successful): O'Neill v Malcouronne [2021] NZCA 556
- High Court appeal (successful): Malcouronne v O'Neill [2021] NZHC 641
- Leave application unsuccessful (GST case): Marr v Mills [2021] NZCA 505
Selected settlements & outcomes
- District Court proceeding against insurer: settled
- Accountant in NZICA/CAANZ disciplinary proceeding: counsel
- Solicitor facing NZLS disciplinary proceedings: advice
- Commercial claim at mediation: manufacturing materials case, settled
- Professional duty breach at mediation: settled
- Sale and purchase property liability: settled
- Arbitration proceeding — property contributions: settled
- Relationship property dispute at mediation: complex, settled
- Family Protection Act claim: settled
- Land covenant High Court application: settled
- Relationship property arbitration: successful spouse-party representation
- Life insurance trauma claim: 100% settlement (~$850,000 recovery)
- Life insurance policy claim: 100% settlement (~$100,000 recovery)
- Solicitor NZLS complaint: successful defence
- Solicitor LCRO appeal: successful
- Fire damage claim: commercial negotiated outcome
- Relationship property settlement: ~$400,000 (short relationship)
- Commercial property fire: advice on material damage and business interruption
- Product recall: insurance brokerage client advice
- Relationship property agreements: independent legal advice
- Professional indemnity: accounting professional advice (insured/uninsured components)
- Shareholder dispute: counsel, resolved at mediation
- Insurance brokerage litigation: completed with departing brokers/advisers
- Motor vehicle policy: 100% settlement
“Legal work and litigation in particular is complex and difficult. After about twenty years of practice, I have been involved in cases where things have not gone to plan, and people have been unhappy. When you engage a barrister, it is wise to seek balanced information about that person's track record and experience. That means not focussing solely on the cases that have gone entirely to plan. I am happy to have that discussion with you, as any good, experienced, lawyer should be.”
Legal tech ventures
Steve founded The Legal Drive Limited, developing:
- lawdbl — NZ-based lawyer-finder service
- Two Bees — civil court costs calculator for NZ lawyers
- Remote Legal — online document attestation service (2020–2023, retired)
Testimonials
“Steve exactly knows what he does and what he brings to the table to his clients. Steve has been more than a legal matter expert to me in last 3 years. He was a true friend, mentor and always wished the best for me. My needs were put in front vs financial expectations and I felt really looked after. I really recommend Steve if you after great results!”
“Getting Steve's assistance was invaluable. His submissions were clear and succinct and were key to obtaining a favourable outcome. Thanks Steve for your assistance. You really helped put the matter in perspective. Your words of wisdom were key to maintaining my sanity.”
“I was in need of advice as to a direction on a somewhat involved a historic legal matter involving negligence by a conveyancing lawyer. I had few options, but when I contacted Steve, I found him both communicative and forthright. Overall, I was impressed with his very detailed advice and practical approach as to how to bring about proceedings in the relevant Tribunal; his strategies for presenting the case assisted me greatly and resulted in a win at the high end of the jurisdiction limit. I would strongly recommend him.”
“I have been referring clients to Steve Keall for several years now, with successful outcomes. Some of the clients I have referred to Steve have been involved in litigation and others have been seeking to avoid it. I have always been impressed by Steve's knowledge, competence, and enthusiasm; his strategic and technical advice and skills have been invaluable. I highly recommend Steve to other instructing solicitors and their clients.”
“Steve is one of the most erudite, energetic, resourceful and decisive barristers I have had a pleasure of working with. The clients of our firm always get delivered a combination of critical thinking, sound judgment and advancement of their cases, through quality advice and advocacy, when Steve is onboard.”
“Steve represented me on my case better than I could have ever imagined. His approach was highly professional and responsive. Steve is quite receptive, not only he kept me informed throughout the process but also valued my opinions and reassured my doubts always. Steve is extremely knowledgeable, professional, and competent. Within weeks Steve not only managed to get a resolution on my case but also was able to obtain a refund from the other party on my case expenses. My needs were put first and I was treated as a friend rather than a case file. Highly recommended if you want results!”